R v Park, Tai Jin [2017] NSWSC 873

R v Park, Tai Jin [2017] NSWSC 873

The court found beyond reasonable doubt that the murder was premeditated for financial gain, making the objective gravity of the offence significantly above mid-range for murder. The plea of guilty warranted a 10% discount, but the seriousness of the crime, including premeditation and the manner of offending, justified a heavy sentence. The offender was sentenced to imprisonment for 36 years with a non-parole period of 27 years.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
30 June 2017
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Outcome
The offender is sentenced to 36 years imprisonment with a non-parole period of 27 years.
Legal Topics
['murder' 'sentencing' 'premeditation' 'financial Gain' 'plea of Guilty']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing

  1. 1 ['Whether the murder was premeditated for financial gain' 'Appropriate sentence for murder with these aggravating features' 'Effect of plea of guilty and prospects for rehabilitation']

Ratio Decidendi

The court found beyond reasonable doubt that the murder was premeditated for financial gain, making the objective gravity of the offence significantly above mid-range for murder. The plea of guilty warranted a 10% discount, but the seriousness of the crime, including premeditation and the manner of offending, justified a heavy sentence. The offender was sentenced to imprisonment for 36 years with a non-parole period of 27 years.

Court Disposition

The offender is sentenced to 36 years imprisonment with a non-parole period of 27 years.

Orders

  • ['Non-parole period of 27 years from 26 August 2015, expiring 25 August 2042' 'Balance of term of 9 years expiring 25 August 2051' 'Eligible for parole on 26 August 2042' 'Charges on the s 166 certificate are dismissed']