Tameeka Group Pty Ltd v Landan Pty Ltd (No 3) [2016] FCA 733

Tameeka Group Pty Ltd v Landan Pty Ltd (No 3) [2016] FCA 733

The option deed was subject to an oral collateral contract requiring Tameeka to pay rent for two years and remain lessee; after liquidation and lease disclaimer, those conditions failed, making the call option no longer exercisable. The applicants could not validly exercise the option. Entry into the Gran-Dia lease did not breach contract, imply unconscionability under ACL, nor constitute conspiracy, as respondents' conduct was mainly for financial and tax planning, based on belief the option was over.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
22 June 2016
Procedural Posture
Commercial Contract Dispute / Final Judgment (liability)
Outcome
Proceedings dismissed
Legal Topics
['option Contracts' 'implied Terms' 'collateral Contracts' 'unconscionable Conduct' 'duty to Cooperate' 'good Faith' 'tort of Conspiracy by Lawful Means']
['contract Law' 'consumer Law'] ['option Contracts' 'implied Terms' 'collateral Contracts' 'unconscionable Conduct' 'duty to Cooperate' 'good Faith' 'tort of Conspiracy by Lawful Means']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Commercial Contract Dispute / Final Judgment (liability)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether collateral contract exists conditioning exercise of option' 'Whether option deed is valid and enforceable' 'Whether duty to cooperate is implied into option agreement' 'Whether obligation of good faith is implied' "Whether option deed is a 'service' under Australian Consumer Law" 'Whether unconscionable conduct under ACL s 21 occurred' 'Whether tort of conspiracy by lawful means was committed']

Ratio Decidendi

The option deed was subject to an oral collateral contract requiring Tameeka to pay rent for two years and remain lessee; after liquidation and lease disclaimer, those conditions failed, making the call option no longer exercisable. The applicants could not validly exercise the option. Entry into the Gran-Dia lease did not breach contract, imply unconscionability under ACL, nor constitute conspiracy, as respondents' conduct was mainly for financial and tax planning, based on belief the option was over.

Court Disposition

Proceedings dismissed

Orders

  • ['The proceedings are dismissed.' "The applicants pay the respondents' costs of the proceedings."]