R v Eng; R v Ong [2023] NSWDC 536

R v Eng; R v Ong [2023] NSWDC 536

Both offenders knowingly took part in the cultivation of a large commercial quantity (742 plants) of cannabis by enhanced indoor means as crop-sitters. Their roles were limited but essential to the operation. Objective seriousness places the case in the mid-range. No prior criminal history or significant distinguishing subjective factors. Each entitled to 25% discount for a guilty plea. Special circumstances found due to first time in custody and need for supervised rehabilitation. A total sentence of imprisonment of 4 years and 6 months with a non-parole period of 3 years was appropriate.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
24 April 2023
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Outcome
convicted and sentenced to a term of imprisonment
Legal Topics
['cultivation of Cannabis' 'enhanced Indoor Means' 'large Commercial Quantity' 'sentencing' 'special Circumstances' 'parity' 'offers of Assistance' 'subjective Factors']
['criminal Law'] ['cultivation of Cannabis' 'enhanced Indoor Means' 'large Commercial Quantity' 'sentencing' 'special Circumstances' 'parity' 'offers of Assistance' 'subjective Factors']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Appropriate sentence for knowingly taking part in cultivation of a large commercial quantity of cannabis plants by enhanced indoor means' 'Assessment of roles as crop-sitters vs principals' 'Application of standard non-parole period and sentencing principles' 'Assessment of subjective circumstances and offers of assistance']

Ratio Decidendi

Both offenders knowingly took part in the cultivation of a large commercial quantity (742 plants) of cannabis by enhanced indoor means as crop-sitters. Their roles were limited but essential to the operation. Objective seriousness places the case in the mid-range. No prior criminal history or significant distinguishing subjective factors. Each entitled to 25% discount for a guilty plea. Special circumstances found due to first time in custody and need for supervised rehabilitation. A total sentence of imprisonment of 4 years and 6 months with a non-parole period of 3 years was appropriate.

Court Disposition

convicted and sentenced to a term of imprisonment

Orders

  • ['Tan Chee Eng: Convicted. Sentenced to 4 years and 6 months imprisonment, non-parole period of 3 years, commencing 21 March 2022, eligible for parole 20 March 2025, balance of term expires 20 September 2026.' 'Kheng Joo Ong: Convicted. Sentenced to 4 years and 6 months imprisonment, non-parole period of 3 years,...