Banks v State of Western Australia [2009] FCA 703
As the application had twice failed the registration test, with no amendment or prospects of amendment, and no other reasons were identified for not dismissing, the Court exercised its discretion to dismiss the application pursuant to s 190F(6) of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth).
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 June 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Native Title Application / Application for Dismissal Under S 190 F(6) of the Native Title Act 1993 (cth)
- Outcome
- Application dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['registration Test' "court's Discretionary Power to Dismiss" 'procedural Dismissal Under Native Title Act']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Native Title Application / Application for Dismissal Under S 190 F(6) of the Native Title Act 1993 (cth)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the application should be dismissed pursuant to s 190F(6) of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth)' 'Whether the application has been amended or is likely to be amended in a way that would result in a different outcome' 'Whether there is any other reason not to dismiss the application']
Ratio Decidendi
As the application had twice failed the registration test, with no amendment or prospects of amendment, and no other reasons were identified for not dismissing, the Court exercised its discretion to dismiss the application pursuant to s 190F(6) of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth).
Court Disposition
Application dismissed.
Orders
- ['The application be dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment