Burn v St George Community Housing Ltd [2022] NSWCATAP 293
The appeal was dismissed because no error of law or relevant procedural unfairness was found. The Tribunal acted within jurisdiction, appropriately applied statutory provisions, and there was no evidence of retaliatory conduct or malice. Execution of the warrant was lawful; hardship and factual matters did not give rise to grounds for appeal.
- Parties
- Appellant: Tania Ann Burn; Respondent: St George Community Housing Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 September 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Appeal Panel Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Termination of Tenancy, Social Housing, Succession to Tenancy, Retaliatory Termination, Warrant of Possession
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tania Ann Burn
Appellant
St George Community Housing Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Appeal Panel Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Tribunal erred in failing to consider the landlord's internal appeal process (procedural fairness)
- 2 Whether termination of the tenancy was unfair or led to homelessness
- 3 Whether termination and eviction were executed lawfully and non-retaliatory
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed because no error of law or relevant procedural unfairness was found. The Tribunal acted within jurisdiction, appropriately applied statutory provisions, and there was no evidence of retaliatory conduct or malice. Execution of the warrant was lawful; hardship and factual matters did not give rise to grounds for appeal.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment