Basha v Rathsam [2016] NSWCATAP 35
The applicant failed to establish any right to leave to appeal, as there was no evidence that the Tribunal's decision was not fair and equitable or against the weight of evidence; in particular, no agreed payment plan was established, nor any retaliatory motive in the notice, as required under section 115 of the...
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 February 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Internal Appeal / Leave to Appeal and Merits of Internal Appeal
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal refused; appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['leave to Appeal' 'retaliatory Evictions' 'internal Appeals' 'termination Notice']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Internal Appeal / Leave to Appeal and Merits of Internal Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the decision of the Tribunal was not fair and equitable under clause 12 of Schedule 4 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW)' 'Whether the decision of the Tribunal was against the weight of evidence' 'Whether the termination notice was given as a retaliatory notice under section 115 of the Residential Tenancies Act 2010 (NSW)']
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant failed to establish any right to leave to appeal, as there was no evidence that the Tribunal's decision was not fair and equitable or against the weight of evidence; in particular, no agreed payment plan was established, nor any retaliatory motive in the notice, as required under section 115 of the Residential Tenancies Act 2010 (NSW).
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal refused; appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal is refused.' 'The appeal is dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment