R v Follett [2011] NSWDC 251
The seriousness of the ongoing supply of methylamphetamine, the quantity supplied, the offender's role in distribution, and personal circumstances were balanced to impose a custodial sentence. A 25% sentencing discount was applied for the guilty plea. The sentence was structured with specified non-parole and parole periods and parole conditions, following correct calculation of the discount as per legislative requirements.
- Parties
- Prosecution: The Crown; Defendant: Tara Elizabeth Follett
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 March 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- Convicted and sentenced to imprisonment; sentence adjusted following correction of calculation error; parole ordered.
- Legal Topics
- Sentence, Ongoing Supply, Methylamphetamine, Utilitarian Discount, Parole, Objective Criminality
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Crown
Prosecution
Tara Elizabeth Follett
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate sentence for ongoing supply of methylamphetamine
- 2 Assessment of objective and subjective criminality
- 3 Application of utilitarian discount for guilty plea
Ratio Decidendi
The seriousness of the ongoing supply of methylamphetamine, the quantity supplied, the offender's role in distribution, and personal circumstances were balanced to impose a custodial sentence. A 25% sentencing discount was applied for the guilty plea. The sentence was structured with specified non-parole and parole periods and parole conditions, following correct calculation of the discount as per legislative requirements.
Court Disposition
Convicted and sentenced to imprisonment; sentence adjusted following correction of calculation error; parole ordered.
Orders
- Tara Elizabeth Follett convicted of ongoing supply of methylamphetamine on two indictable counts.
- Sentenced (after correction) to an overall term of eleven months and one week, commencing 8 June 2010.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment