R v Ayoub [2020] NSWSC 154
The conditions relating to reporting and employment are appropriately varied given changed circumstances and lack of opposition; however, financial inability to pay for ongoing electronic monitoring does not warrant dispensing with a key condition originally offered to address bail concerns, especially for show cause offences of this seriousness.
- Parties
- Applicant: Tarek Ayoub; Respondent: Crown
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 March 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Bail Variation Application / Determination of Application to Vary Bail Conditions
- Outcome
- Reporting obligations and employer conditions varied; requirement for electronic monitoring not dispensed with; other bail conditions remain unchanged.
- Legal Topics
- Bail, Variation of Bail Conditions, Electronic Monitoring, Accessory After the Fact to Murder, Pervert the Course of Justice
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tarek Ayoub
Applicant
Crown
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Bail Variation Application / Determination of Application to Vary Bail Conditions
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether bail conditions should be varied to reduce reporting obligations and permit employment with a new employer
- 2 Whether requirement for electronic monitoring should be dispensed with on basis of financial hardship
Ratio Decidendi
The conditions relating to reporting and employment are appropriately varied given changed circumstances and lack of opposition; however, financial inability to pay for ongoing electronic monitoring does not warrant dispensing with a key condition originally offered to address bail concerns, especially for show cause offences of this seriousness.
Court Disposition
Reporting obligations and employer conditions varied; requirement for electronic monitoring not dispensed with; other bail conditions remain unchanged.
Orders
- Bail reporting varied to once daily at Bankstown Police Station between 4:00pm and 8:00pm.
- Bail security conditions varied: For Police Charge Number H 69998468, an agreement to forfeit $5,000 by Sahar Ayoub if the applicant fails to appear; for Police Charge Number H 68071661, Sahar Ayoub to deposit and agree to forfeit $5,000 if the applicant fails to attend court or comply with bail.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment