Ibrahim v Wu (No 2) [2009] FCA 1151

Ibrahim v Wu (No 2) [2009] FCA 1151

The application to stay proceedings was dismissed in accordance with the reasoning in Ibrahim v Carroll (No 2) [2009] FCA 1150.

Parties
Applicant: Tarek Ibrahim; First Respondent: Jingshan Wu; Second Respondent: University of Western Australia
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
24 September 2009
Procedural Posture
Application / Interlocutory (application to Stay Proceeding)
Outcome
Application to stay dismissed
Legal Topics
Application for Stay, Case Management
Civil Procedure Application for Stay Case Management

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Tarek Ibrahim

Applicant

Jingshan Wu

First Respondent

University of Western Australia

Second Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application / Interlocutory (application to Stay Proceeding)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the proceeding should be stayed pending an application for leave to appeal

Ratio Decidendi

The application to stay proceedings was dismissed in accordance with the reasoning in Ibrahim v Carroll (No 2) [2009] FCA 1150.

Court Disposition

Application to stay dismissed

Orders

  • The applicant's oral application that this proceeding be indefinitely stayed is dismissed.
  • By 4:00 pm on 15 October 2009, the applicant is to file and serve a statement of claim, setting out the basis of his claim and the provisions of the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) upon which he relies for the relief claimed.