Tarkine National Coalition Incorporated v Minister for the Environment (No 2) [2014] FCA 613
The applicant, having not opposed the making of costs orders, is to pay the first and second respondents' costs. The second respondent is granted leave to file an interlocutory application for a non-party costs order by 23 June 2014.
- Parties
- Applicant: Tarkine National Coalition Incorporated; First Respondent: Minister for the Environment; Second Respondent: Venture Minerals; Third Respondent: State of Tasmania
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 June 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Costs Application Following Substantive Judgment / Post Judgment; Costs Determination
- Outcome
- Costs awarded; leave granted for interlocutory application
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Non Party Costs Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tarkine National Coalition Incorporated
Applicant
Minister for the Environment
First Respondent
Venture Minerals
Second Respondent
State of Tasmania
Third Respondent
Procedural Posture
Costs Application Following Substantive Judgment / Post Judgment; Costs Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant should pay the first and second respondents' costs of the proceeding
- 2 Whether to grant leave to the second respondent to file an interlocutory application for non-party costs orders
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant, having not opposed the making of costs orders, is to pay the first and second respondents' costs. The second respondent is granted leave to file an interlocutory application for a non-party costs order by 23 June 2014.
Court Disposition
Costs awarded; leave granted for interlocutory application
Orders
- The applicant pay the first and second respondents' costs of the proceeding.
- The second respondent have leave to file and serve any interlocutory application for a non-party costs order and any supporting affidavits on or before 23 June 2014.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment