Tax Practitioners Board v Lamede Group Proprietary Limited (No 2) [2016] FCA 656
The respondents, not being registered tax agents, provided and advertised tax agent services in contravention of the Tax Agent Services Act 2009 (Cth); pecuniary penalties are imposed according to the seriousness and number of contraventions.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 June 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Regulator and Consumer Protection / Post Judgment Orders and Penalties
- Outcome
- Declarations of contraventions and imposition of pecuniary penalties; orders for payment by instalments.
- Legal Topics
- ['tax Agent Services' 'pecuniary Penalties' 'advertising of Professional Services']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Regulator and Consumer Protection / Post Judgment Orders and Penalties
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the respondents provided tax agent services without being registered under the Tax Agent Services Act 2009 (Cth)' 'Whether the respondents advertised provision of tax agent services whilst not registered']
Ratio Decidendi
The respondents, not being registered tax agents, provided and advertised tax agent services in contravention of the Tax Agent Services Act 2009 (Cth); pecuniary penalties are imposed according to the seriousness and number of contraventions.
Court Disposition
Declarations of contraventions and imposition of pecuniary penalties; orders for payment by instalments.
Orders
- ['Declarations that first and second respondents contravened s 50-5(1) by providing tax agent services while unregistered' 'Declaration that first respondent contravened s 50-10(1) by advertising provision of tax agent services while unregistered' 'Orders for first respondent to pay specified pecuniary penalties...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment