Taylor Projects Group Pty Limited v Brick Dept Pty Limited & Ors [2005] NSWSC 439
Service of a payment claim under s13(1) of the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW) occurs when the claim is received at the respondent's ordinary place of business, irrespective of business hours; therefore, Taylor was required to provide a payment schedule by 19 January 2005 and failed to do so. Consequently, Taylor was precluded from participating further in the adjudication. There was no constructive resubmission of a payment schedule as required by s17(2)(b). The adjudication determination was valid and not void.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 May 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Application to Set Aside Adjudication Determination / Judgment at First Instance
- Outcome
- Adjudication Determination valid.
- Legal Topics
- ['building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (nsw)' 'adjudication Determinations' 'payment Claims' 'payment Schedules' 'service of Documents']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application to Set Aside Adjudication Determination / Judgment at First Instance
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the adjudicator erred in law in finding a payment claim was served on 5 January 2005 under the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW)' "Whether a letter from Taylor's solicitors constituted constructive resubmission of a payment schedule under s17(2)(b) of the Act" 'Whether the requirements for a valid adjudication determination under the Act were satisfied']
Ratio Decidendi
Service of a payment claim under s13(1) of the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW) occurs when the claim is received at the respondent's ordinary place of business, irrespective of business hours; therefore, Taylor was required to provide a payment schedule by 19 January 2005 and failed to do so. Consequently, Taylor was precluded from participating further in the adjudication. There was no constructive resubmission of a payment schedule as required by s17(2)(b). The adjudication determination was valid and not void.
Court Disposition
Adjudication Determination valid.
Orders
- []
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment