TB v State of New South Wales [2012] NSWSC 143
The limitation period in respect of the plaintiff’s claim is suspended for the period during which she was under a disability (psychiatric injury severely impeding her ability to manage her affairs) from when she turned 18 until the end of 2003. Alternatively, the plaintiff satisfied the statutory requirements for an extension of time because she was not aware of the nature or extent of her personal injury until 1 August 2005 and filed the application within three years. It is just and reasonable to extend the limitation period as the defendants will not suffer significant prejudice and a fair trial is possible.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 March 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Procedural and Other Rulings / Interlocutory Application for Declaration/extension of Limitation Period
- Outcome
- Plaintiff’s application granted: limitation period suspended during disability; alternatively, extension of time granted; costs reserved.
- Legal Topics
- ['limitation of Actions' 'disability and Limitation Periods' 'extension of Time' 'negligence—breach of Duty by State Authorities' 'vicarious Liability' 'child Protection—duty to Report Abuse']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Procedural and Other Rulings / Interlocutory Application for Declaration/extension of Limitation Period
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the limitation period for the plaintiff’s proceedings is suspended due to disability under the Limitation Act 1969 (NSW)' 'Whether, alternatively, the plaintiff should be granted an extension of time to commence proceedings under ss 60G and 60I of the Limitation Act 1969 (NSW)' 'Whether the defendants owed and breached a duty of care in failing to report abuse to police']
Ratio Decidendi
The limitation period in respect of the plaintiff’s claim is suspended for the period during which she was under a disability (psychiatric injury severely impeding her ability to manage her affairs) from when she turned 18 until the end of 2003. Alternatively, the plaintiff satisfied the statutory requirements for an extension of time because she was not aware of the nature or extent of her personal injury until 1 August 2005 and filed the application within three years. It is just and reasonable to extend the limitation period as the defendants will not suffer significant prejudice and a fair trial is possible.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff’s application granted: limitation period suspended during disability; alternatively, extension of time granted; costs reserved.
Orders
- ["The limitation period in relation to the plaintiff's proceedings is suspended by reason of the plaintiff's disability from the day she turned 18 until the end of 2003." 'In the alternative, the plaintiff is granted an extension of time within which to commence proceedings against the defendants up to and including...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment