TCM Construction Group Pty Ltd v Neich [2024] NSWCATAP 4
The appeal was dismissed as no error of law was found in the Tribunal's reasoning or orders; evidentiary preference for one expert over another was within Tribunal's discretion, and relevant standards did not apply as contended by the appellant. Leave to appeal was refused as none of the grounds required by the Civil & Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) or articulated in Collins v Urban [2014] NSWCATAP 17 were satisfied.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 January 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Determination
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed, leave to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- ['defective Workmanship' 'remedial Orders' 'appeal' 'expert Evidence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Tribunal erred in making orders requiring the appellant to remedy defective work' 'Whether a question of law arises warranting leave to appeal' 'Whether Tribunal applied the correct standards and tolerances for building defects' "Whether the Tribunal's acceptance of expert evidence was legally erroneous"]
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed as no error of law was found in the Tribunal's reasoning or orders; evidentiary preference for one expert over another was within Tribunal's discretion, and relevant standards did not apply as contended by the appellant. Leave to appeal was refused as none of the grounds required by the Civil & Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) or articulated in Collins v Urban [2014] NSWCATAP 17 were satisfied.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed, leave to appeal refused
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal refused.' 'Appeal dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment