Abraham v Magistrate Stone, Deputy State Coroner [2017] NSWSC 1684
Given the equal ranking of divorced parents, and the absence of an executor or will, practicalities and urgent need for a funeral without unreasonable delay, combined with substantial consultation and a compromise proposal, support the father's proposed arrangements: a Maori funeral in Australia, followed by cremation, and the ashes equally divided between both parents. This arrangement best reflects legal principles while providing for substantial cultural rites and the participation of both parents.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 December 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Inherent Jurisdiction Claim Regarding Burial Rights / Principal Judgment
- Outcome
- Cross-Claim (father's proposal) substantially granted; Applicant's (mother's) proposals refused
- Legal Topics
- ['burial and Cremation Dispute' 'equal Ranking of Parents' 'maori Cultural Considerations' 'funeral Arrangements' 'practicalities of Burial' 'inherent Jurisdiction']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Inherent Jurisdiction Claim Regarding Burial Rights / Principal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Who has the right to possession of the deceased's body to carry out funeral arrangements?" 'What is the significance of Maori culture in determining funeral arrangements for the deceased?' 'How should equal rights of divorced parents be resolved in the context of a burial/cremation dispute?']
Ratio Decidendi
Given the equal ranking of divorced parents, and the absence of an executor or will, practicalities and urgent need for a funeral without unreasonable delay, combined with substantial consultation and a compromise proposal, support the father's proposed arrangements: a Maori funeral in Australia, followed by cremation, and the ashes equally divided between both parents. This arrangement best reflects legal principles while providing for substantial cultural rites and the participation of both parents.
Court Disposition
Cross-Claim (father's proposal) substantially granted; Applicant's (mother's) proposals refused
Orders
- ['The First Defendant is at liberty to release the remains of Pono Wairu Aperahama to Lance and Alice King Funerals or such other funeral service as the Second Defendant/Cross-Claimant may direct for the purpose of carrying out the funeral arrangements referred to in [47]-[49] of the Affidavit of Piki-Ora...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment