Teda Bayside Pty Ltd v Woollahra Municipal Council [2016] NSWLEC 1209
The Court is satisfied that the agreement reached between the parties meets the requirements of s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 and can be made as an order of the Court. No merit assessment of the underlying issues is made by the Court.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 May 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Development Application Appeal / Conciliation Conference Leading to Agreed Orders
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld. Development Application approved subject to conditions. Leave granted to amend application. Costs payable by Applicant as agreed or assessed.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'conciliation Conference' 'court Approved Agreement']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Development Application Appeal / Conciliation Conference Leading to Agreed Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the parties have reached an agreement capable of being endorsed by the Court under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court is satisfied that the agreement reached between the parties meets the requirements of s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 and can be made as an order of the Court. No merit assessment of the underlying issues is made by the Court.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld. Development Application approved subject to conditions. Leave granted to amend application. Costs payable by Applicant as agreed or assessed.
Orders
- ["The Applicant is granted leave to amend Development Application DA 542/2014 in accordance with the plans and documentation set out in conditions A.2 of the conditions annexed at 'A' to this agreement." "The Applicant is to pay the Respondent's cost arising under section 97B of the Environmental Planning and...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment