Teekay Shipping (Australia) Pty Ltd v Auld [2020] FCAFC 19
The Fair Work Commission had issued reasons but no formal decision answering the question originally posed, or any further question informally identified, and thereby failed to act as required; a constitutional writ of mandamus should issue requiring the Commission to answer by decision the question or questions posed to it by the Commission's President under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth).
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 February 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Constitutional Writs and Related Relief / Final Judgment and Orders
- Outcome
- Constitutional writ of mandamus issued; no order as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['fair Work Commission' 'constitutional Writ of Mandamus' 'referral of Question to Full Bench' 'failure to Issue a Decision' 'enterprise Agreement Consultation Term']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Constitutional Writs and Related Relief / Final Judgment and Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Fair Work Commission had failed to answer by decision the question or questions posed to it by the Commission's President under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth)." 'Whether a constitutional writ of mandamus should issue requiring the Fair Work Commission to answer the referred question or questions by decision.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Fair Work Commission had issued reasons but no formal decision answering the question originally posed, or any further question informally identified, and thereby failed to act as required; a constitutional writ of mandamus should issue requiring the Commission to answer by decision the question or questions posed to it by the Commission's President under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth).
Court Disposition
Constitutional writ of mandamus issued; no order as to costs.
Orders
- ["A constitutional writ of mandamus be issued to the twenty second respondent, the Fair Work Commission, requiring the Commission to answer, by decision, such question or questions which were posed to it for answering by the Commission's President under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth)." 'No order as to costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment