Singh v Migration Review Tribunal [2004] FCA 1304
The parties' written submissions accorded with the tentative view expressed on 25 August 2004, so the Court made costs orders requiring the respondent to pay the applicant's costs thrown away by the adjournment on 5 May 2004 and otherwise requiring the applicant to pay the respondent's costs of and incidental to the application.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 October 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Application Involving the Migration Review Tribunal / Judgment on Costs Following Judgment on 25 August 2004
- Outcome
- Costs orders made.
- Legal Topics
- ['migration Review Tribunal' 'costs of Adjournment' 'costs of Application']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application Involving the Migration Review Tribunal / Judgment on Costs Following Judgment on 25 August 2004
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What costs orders should be made after judgment in the application.' "Whether the respondent should pay the applicant's costs thrown away by the adjournment on 5 May 2004." "Whether the applicant should otherwise pay the respondent's costs of and incidental to the application."]
Ratio Decidendi
The parties' written submissions accorded with the tentative view expressed on 25 August 2004, so the Court made costs orders requiring the respondent to pay the applicant's costs thrown away by the adjournment on 5 May 2004 and otherwise requiring the applicant to pay the respondent's costs of and incidental to the application.
Court Disposition
Costs orders made.
Orders
- ['The respondent pay the costs of the applicant thrown away by the adjournment on 5 May 2004.' 'The applicant otherwise pay the costs of the respondent of and incidental to the application, to be taxed if not agreed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment