Telegraph St Ives Development Pty Ltd v Ku-ring-gai Council [2023] NSWLEC 1528
The Court granted the modification application as the development, as modified, remained substantially the same as originally approved, and all statutory procedural requirements for modification were met, with both parties agreeing to the changes following a conciliation conference.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 September 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Application to Modify Development Consent (class 1) / Final Decision After Conciliation Conference
- Outcome
- Application granted; modification of consent approved by Court orders.
- Legal Topics
- ['modification of Development Consent' 'conciliation Conference' 'seniors Living Development']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application to Modify Development Consent (class 1) / Final Decision After Conciliation Conference
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the modification application for development consent DA0415/16 should be granted under s 4.55(2) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979' 'Whether the modification results in development substantially the same as originally approved' 'Whether jurisdictional and statutory requirements are met']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court granted the modification application as the development, as modified, remained substantially the same as originally approved, and all statutory procedural requirements for modification were met, with both parties agreeing to the changes following a conciliation conference.
Court Disposition
Application granted; modification of consent approved by Court orders.
Orders
- ['The application is granted.' 'Development consent DA0415/16 for demolition of an existing dwelling and construction of 10 townhouses for seniors living including basement car parking, drainage/infrastructure works, and landscaping, is modified in the terms set out in Annexure A.' 'Development consent DA0415/16 as...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment