Telstra Corporation Limited v Melbourne City Council [2020] FCA 305

Telstra Corporation Limited v Melbourne City Council [2020] FCA 305

The New Payphone Cabinets, when installed and used to display only advertising related to standard telephone services (STS), meet the definitional requirements of 'low-impact facilities' under Schedule 3 to the Telecommunications Act 1997 (Cth) and the Determination. The MCC's decision that they were not low-impact facilities misconceived the test by focusing on future hypothetical use for commercial advertising, which is contingent on subsequent planning approval and does not affect their classification at installation.

Parties
Applicant: Telstra Corporation Limited; First Respondent: Melbourne City Council; Second Respondent: City of Sydney Council; Third Respondent: Brisbane City Council
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
10 March 2020
Procedural Posture
Application for Declaration / Final Judgment at First Instance
Outcome
Application granted. Declaration made.
Legal Topics
Low Impact Facilities, Planning Approval, Immunity From State Planning Laws, Statutory Construction

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 18 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Telstra Corporation Limited

Applicant

Melbourne City Council

First Respondent

City of Sydney Council

Second Respondent

Brisbane City Council

Third Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application for Declaration / Final Judgment at First Instance

  1. 1 Whether New Payphone Cabinets are 'low-impact facilities' under Schedule 3 of the Telecommunications Act 1997 (Cth) and the Telecommunications (Low-impact Facilities) Determination 2018 (Cth)
  2. 2 Whether planning permission is required for their installation
  3. 3 Whether the display of commercial advertising affects the cabinets' classification as low-impact facilities

Ratio Decidendi

The New Payphone Cabinets, when installed and used to display only advertising related to standard telephone services (STS), meet the definitional requirements of 'low-impact facilities' under Schedule 3 to the Telecommunications Act 1997 (Cth) and the Determination. The MCC's decision that they were not low-impact facilities misconceived the test by focusing on future hypothetical use for commercial advertising, which is contingent on subsequent planning approval and does not affect their classification at installation.

Court Disposition

Application granted. Declaration made.

Orders

  • The installation of New Payphone Cabinets is an activity authorised by Schedule 3 to the Telecommunications Act 1997 (Cth) because it involves the installation of 'low-impact facilities' within the meaning of Schedule 3 to the Act and the Telecommunications (Low-impact Facilities) Determination 2018 (Cth).
  • The parties file and serve any submissions in relation to costs within 7 days.