Telstra Corporation Limited v Melbourne City Council [2020] FCA 305
The New Payphone Cabinets, when installed and used to display only advertising related to standard telephone services (STS), meet the definitional requirements of 'low-impact facilities' under Schedule 3 to the Telecommunications Act 1997 (Cth) and the Determination. The MCC's decision that they were not low-impact facilities misconceived the test by focusing on future hypothetical use for commercial advertising, which is contingent on subsequent planning approval and does not affect their classification at installation.
- Parties
- Applicant: Telstra Corporation Limited; First Respondent: Melbourne City Council; Second Respondent: City of Sydney Council; Third Respondent: Brisbane City Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 March 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Declaration / Final Judgment at First Instance
- Outcome
- Application granted. Declaration made.
- Legal Topics
- Low Impact Facilities, Planning Approval, Immunity From State Planning Laws, Statutory Construction
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Telstra Corporation Limited
Applicant
Melbourne City Council
First Respondent
City of Sydney Council
Second Respondent
Brisbane City Council
Third Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Declaration / Final Judgment at First Instance
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether New Payphone Cabinets are 'low-impact facilities' under Schedule 3 of the Telecommunications Act 1997 (Cth) and the Telecommunications (Low-impact Facilities) Determination 2018 (Cth)
- 2 Whether planning permission is required for their installation
- 3 Whether the display of commercial advertising affects the cabinets' classification as low-impact facilities
Ratio Decidendi
The New Payphone Cabinets, when installed and used to display only advertising related to standard telephone services (STS), meet the definitional requirements of 'low-impact facilities' under Schedule 3 to the Telecommunications Act 1997 (Cth) and the Determination. The MCC's decision that they were not low-impact facilities misconceived the test by focusing on future hypothetical use for commercial advertising, which is contingent on subsequent planning approval and does not affect their classification at installation.
Court Disposition
Application granted. Declaration made.
Orders
- The installation of New Payphone Cabinets is an activity authorised by Schedule 3 to the Telecommunications Act 1997 (Cth) because it involves the installation of 'low-impact facilities' within the meaning of Schedule 3 to the Act and the Telecommunications (Low-impact Facilities) Determination 2018 (Cth).
- The parties file and serve any submissions in relation to costs within 7 days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment