Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing & Allied Services Union of Australia & Ors v Telstra Corp Ltd [1998] FCA 1089
Interlocutory relief is refused because some conditions precedent to the characterisation of industrial action as protected cannot yet be known; declaratory relief as sought would be premature and risk being advisory, as relevant circumstances (completion, injury or damage, parties involved, purpose of action) remain uncertain.
- Parties
- First Applicant: Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia; Second Applicant: Colin Cooper; Third Applicant: Len Cooper; Fourth Applicant: Ian McLean; Respondent: Telstra Corporation Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 August 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Interlocutory Relief and Declaratory Orders / Interlocutory (refusal), Directions Pending
- Outcome
- Application for interlocutory relief refused; application adjourned for directions.
- Legal Topics
- Protected Industrial Action, Declaratory Relief, Interlocutory Injunctions, Judicial Discretion
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia
First Applicant
Colin Cooper
Second Applicant
Len Cooper
Third Applicant
Ian McLean
Fourth Applicant
Telstra Corporation Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Interlocutory Relief and Declaratory Orders / Interlocutory (refusal), Directions Pending
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether interlocutory relief should be granted in relation to industrial action claimed to be protected under Workplace Relations Act 1996
- 2 Whether declaratory relief can be granted regarding future or incomplete industrial actions
Ratio Decidendi
Interlocutory relief is refused because some conditions precedent to the characterisation of industrial action as protected cannot yet be known; declaratory relief as sought would be premature and risk being advisory, as relevant circumstances (completion, injury or damage, parties involved, purpose of action) remain uncertain.
Court Disposition
Application for interlocutory relief refused; application adjourned for directions.
Orders
- Application for interlocutory relief refused.
- Application adjourned to 4 September 1998 for directions as to pleadings and the presentation of evidence.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment