Telstra Corporation Ltd v Australian Telecommunications Authority & Anor [1997] FCA 542

Telstra Corporation Ltd v Australian Telecommunications Authority & Anor [1997] FCA 542

In the Court's discretion, neither Telstra nor Optus should be ordered to pay the other's costs, due to the nature of the proceeding, the circumstances under which Optus was joined, and Telstra's reason for discontinuance after achieving its commercial objectives.

Parties
Applicant: Telstra Corporation Limited; First Respondent: Australian Telecommunications Authority; Second Respondent: Optus Networks Pty Limited
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
03 June 1997
Procedural Posture
Costs Application Following Discontinuance / Decision on Costs
Outcome
No order as to costs between Telstra and Optus.
Legal Topics
Costs, Discontinuance, Dominance in Telecommunications Market

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Telstra Corporation Limited

Applicant

Australian Telecommunications Authority

First Respondent

Optus Networks Pty Limited

Second Respondent

Procedural Posture

Costs Application Following Discontinuance / Decision on Costs

  1. 1 Whether any party should be ordered to pay the costs of another party following discontinuance of proceedings
  2. 2 Whether Optus, as a respondent joined at its own risk, is entitled to costs after discontinuance by Telstra

Ratio Decidendi

In the Court's discretion, neither Telstra nor Optus should be ordered to pay the other's costs, due to the nature of the proceeding, the circumstances under which Optus was joined, and Telstra's reason for discontinuance after achieving its commercial objectives.

Court Disposition

No order as to costs between Telstra and Optus.

Orders

  • There be no order as to the costs of either Telstra or Optus of the present proceeding.