Telstra Ltd v Sulaiman [2024] NSWSC 440

Telstra Ltd v Sulaiman [2024] NSWSC 440

The plaintiff failed to show that $500 per week is the reasonable amount each defendant requires for their own living expenses rather than $1,000; insufficient proof provided to warrant further reduction of the allowance under the freezing order.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
19 April 2024
Procedural Posture
Equity Commercial List / Interlocutory Application on Plaintiff's Notice of Motion to Vary Freezing Order
Outcome
Plaintiff's Notice of Motion dismissed; costs of the plaintiff's Notice of Motion be the defendants' costs in the cause
Legal Topics
['freezing Orders' 'interim Preservation' 'living Expenses Under Freezing Order']
['equity' 'civil Procedure' 'commercial Law'] ['freezing Orders' 'interim Preservation' 'living Expenses Under Freezing Order']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Equity Commercial List / Interlocutory Application on Plaintiff's Notice of Motion to Vary Freezing Order

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the weekly living expenses allowance in the freezing order should be reduced from $1,000 to $500']

Ratio Decidendi

The plaintiff failed to show that $500 per week is the reasonable amount each defendant requires for their own living expenses rather than $1,000; insufficient proof provided to warrant further reduction of the allowance under the freezing order.

Court Disposition

Plaintiff's Notice of Motion dismissed; costs of the plaintiff's Notice of Motion be the defendants' costs in the cause

Orders

  • ["Plaintiff's Notice of Motion filed 21 March 2024 is dismissed" "Costs of the plaintiff's Notice of Motion filed 21 March 2024 be the defendants' costs in the cause"]