Smilevska v Smilevska [2015] NSWSC 1794

Smilevska v Smilevska [2015] NSWSC 1794

The first defendant is a person under legal incapacity and cannot conduct proceedings, even via an attorney, without a tutor appointed under the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules; directions were made to facilitate the appointment of a tutor.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
30 November 2015
Procedural Posture
Equity / Interlocutory Decision Regarding Appointment of Tutor for First Defendant
Outcome
Proceedings stayed until appointment of tutor for the first defendant; directions given for nomination and appointment process.
Legal Topics
['legal Incapacity' 'appointment of Tutor' 'civil Procedure' 'constructive Trust' 'promissory Estoppel' 'contract' 'power of Attorney']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Equity / Interlocutory Decision Regarding Appointment of Tutor for First Defendant

  1. 1 ['Whether the first defendant is a person under legal incapacity within the meaning of Civil Procedure Act 2005 and Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 7.13' 'Whether proceedings may be conducted through an attorney or require appointment of a tutor' 'Who should be appointed as tutor for the first defendant']

Ratio Decidendi

The first defendant is a person under legal incapacity and cannot conduct proceedings, even via an attorney, without a tutor appointed under the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules; directions were made to facilitate the appointment of a tutor.

Court Disposition

Proceedings stayed until appointment of tutor for the first defendant; directions given for nomination and appointment process.

Orders

  • ['Proceedings are stayed until a tutor is appointed for the first defendant in accordance with Uniform Civil Procedure Rules Part 7 Division 4.' "The parties are to indicate to the Court by 4.00pm on 4 December 2015 whether there is any continuing opposition to the appointment of Mitre Sarafoski and Gorica Sarafoska...