Smilevska v Smilevska [2015] NSWSC 1794
The first defendant is a person under legal incapacity and cannot conduct proceedings, even via an attorney, without a tutor appointed under the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules; directions were made to facilitate the appointment of a tutor.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 November 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Equity / Interlocutory Decision Regarding Appointment of Tutor for First Defendant
- Outcome
- Proceedings stayed until appointment of tutor for the first defendant; directions given for nomination and appointment process.
- Legal Topics
- ['legal Incapacity' 'appointment of Tutor' 'civil Procedure' 'constructive Trust' 'promissory Estoppel' 'contract' 'power of Attorney']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Equity / Interlocutory Decision Regarding Appointment of Tutor for First Defendant
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the first defendant is a person under legal incapacity within the meaning of Civil Procedure Act 2005 and Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 7.13' 'Whether proceedings may be conducted through an attorney or require appointment of a tutor' 'Who should be appointed as tutor for the first defendant']
Ratio Decidendi
The first defendant is a person under legal incapacity and cannot conduct proceedings, even via an attorney, without a tutor appointed under the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules; directions were made to facilitate the appointment of a tutor.
Court Disposition
Proceedings stayed until appointment of tutor for the first defendant; directions given for nomination and appointment process.
Orders
- ['Proceedings are stayed until a tutor is appointed for the first defendant in accordance with Uniform Civil Procedure Rules Part 7 Division 4.' "The parties are to indicate to the Court by 4.00pm on 4 December 2015 whether there is any continuing opposition to the appointment of Mitre Sarafoski and Gorica Sarafoska...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment