Tenstat Pty Limited (ATF Tenstat Yennora Trust) v Valuer-General & Anor [2004] NSWLEC 230
The Court preferred the Valuer-General's analysis, finding that neither the applicant nor Woolworths discharged the onus of showing the valuation should be changed; confirmed the Valuer-General's value as correct.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 April 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment After Hearing
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; valuation confirmed.
- Legal Topics
- ['land Valuation' 'comparison of Sales' 'valuation Methodology']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Valuer-General's valuation of the subject land was correct" 'Whether evidence supports modifying the valuation figure']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court preferred the Valuer-General's analysis, finding that neither the applicant nor Woolworths discharged the onus of showing the valuation should be changed; confirmed the Valuer-General's value as correct.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; valuation confirmed.
Orders
- ['The valuation of the Valuer-General is confirmed and the appeal is dismissed.' 'No order as to costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment