Quickenden v Federated Australian University Staff Association [1988] FCA 365
Although the applicant's case was arguable but not particularly strong, the potential importance of changes to conditions of academic staff that could result from revisions to the draft agreement justified a short-term restraint so both parties could appear and argue whether interlocutory relief should be extended and the show cause order.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 June 1988
- Procedural Posture
- Ex Parte Application for Interim Order / Interlocutory
- Outcome
- Short-term interim injunction granted until 2.15 pm on 21 June 1988 or until further order, with directions for immediate notification and relisting.
- Legal Topics
- ['interlocutory Relief' 'interim Injunction' 'ex Parte Application' 'balance of Convenience' 'serious Question to Be Tried']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Ex Parte Application for Interim Order / Interlocutory
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the applicant had shown a serious question to be tried for the interlocutory relief sought.' 'Whether the balance of convenience favoured granting short-term interlocutory relief.' 'Whether urgent notification and service on the respondents was required before any extension of interlocutory relief.']
Ratio Decidendi
Although the applicant's case was arguable but not particularly strong, the potential importance of changes to conditions of academic staff that could result from revisions to the draft agreement justified a short-term restraint so both parties could appear and argue whether interlocutory relief should be extended and the show cause order.
Court Disposition
Short-term interim injunction granted until 2.15 pm on 21 June 1988 or until further order, with directions for immediate notification and relisting.
Orders
- ['An order was to be made in terms of the minute, inserting 21 June 1988 at 2.15 pm as the return date of the order.' 'The injunction was to restrain the respondents, and each of them, until 2.15 pm on 21 June 1988, or until further order.' 'The applicant is to notify the respondents immediately by telegram or telex...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment