Terence John Bell and Pepsico Australia [1995] IRCA 437
Because the matter had been settled in principle but later misunderstandings had become compounded, and because further evidence and costs should be avoided, the appropriate course was to vary the consent orders to state practical steps for payment, reinstatement certification, resignation documentation and execution of a deed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 August 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Application by Notice of Motion Concerning Alleged Non Compliance With Consent Orders / Revised Reasons for Decision Delivered Ex Tempore
- Outcome
- Leave for short service was granted and the consent orders were varied by further orders.
- Legal Topics
- ['consent Orders' 'variation of Consent Orders' 'reinstatement' 'settlement Payment' 'contempt Application' 'short Service']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application by Notice of Motion Concerning Alleged Non Compliance With Consent Orders / Revised Reasons for Decision Delivered Ex Tempore
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether time for filing and serving the notice of motion should be abridged or short service allowed.' 'Whether the applicant was entitled to proceed to enforce consent orders made on 31 July 1995.' 'Whether declaratory relief or contempt relief should be granted in connection with alleged non-compliance with the consent orders.' 'Whether the consent orders should be varied to resolve misunderstandings between the parties.']
Ratio Decidendi
Because the matter had been settled in principle but later misunderstandings had become compounded, and because further evidence and costs should be avoided, the appropriate course was to vary the consent orders to state practical steps for payment, reinstatement certification, resignation documentation and execution of a deed.
Court Disposition
Leave for short service was granted and the consent orders were varied by further orders.
Orders
- ['Leave is granted for short service of notice of motion and accompanying affidavit.' 'The respondent is to pay to the applicant the sum of $20,000.00 by 5 p.m. Friday 18 August 1995.' 'On Friday, 18 August 1995 the respondent is to provide a letter dated 4 August 1995 to the applicant on letterhead which states:...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment