McCowan V Council of the Law Society of NSW [2014] NSWCATOD 44
The Tribunal approved Mr Brawn as a lay associate because, on the evidence, the applicant established that Mr Brawn was now fit and proper for limited and carefully controlled engagement in a law practice, had sufficient character, understood the standards required of those involved in legal practice, had demonstrated insight and genuine continuing contrition, and had rehabilitated himself. The approval required stringent conditions to protect the public and the profession.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 May 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Application Pursuant to S 17(3)(c) of the Legal Profession Act 2004 Seeking Approval for a Law Practice to Have Alan Richmond Brawn as a Lay Associate / Principal Judgment After Hearings on 5 July 2013 and 27 August 2013
- Outcome
- Application granted subject to conditions; no order as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['lay Associate Application' 'fitness to Resume Involvement With a Law Practice' 'fit and Proper Person' 'character' 'insight' 'contrition' 'rehabilitation' 'conditions on Lay Associate Employment']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application Pursuant to S 17(3)(c) of the Legal Profession Act 2004 Seeking Approval for a Law Practice to Have Alan Richmond Brawn as a Lay Associate / Principal Judgment After Hearings on 5 July 2013 and 27 August 2013
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether Alan Richmond Brawn was a fit and proper person to participate in the responsible and trusted activities involved in conducting legal practice as a lay associate.' 'Whether Mr Brawn had sufficient character, insight, contrition and rehabilitation after his professional misconduct, criminal convictions and removal from the Roll of Legal Practitioners.' "If approval were granted, what conditions should be imposed on Mr Brawn's employment as a lay associate to protect the public and the profession."]
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal approved Mr Brawn as a lay associate because, on the evidence, the applicant established that Mr Brawn was now fit and proper for limited and carefully controlled engagement in a law practice, had sufficient character, understood the standards required of those involved in legal practice, had demonstrated insight and genuine continuing contrition, and had rehabilitated himself. The approval required stringent conditions to protect the public and the profession.
Court Disposition
Application granted subject to conditions; no order as to costs.
Orders
- ['The Tribunal approves Alan Richmond Brawn as a lay associate of the law practice conducted by Terence McCowan known as Legal Wisdom, subject to conditions.' 'The employment of Mr Brawn shall be for a period of only up to two days in any one week period of Monday to Friday inclusive.' 'Mr McCowan must supervise Mr...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment