Coyne v Calabro [2009] NSWSC 1023
Leave should be given to the defendants, plaintiffs, and cross-defendant to adduce further expert evidence where there are significant differences in valuation opinions and communication between a party and the single expert may affect perception of impartiality, so as to maintain open justice and avoid legitimate grievances.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 September 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Equity Proceedings / Procedural Ruling on Leave to Adduce Further Expert Evidence
- Outcome
- Leave granted to adduce further expert evidence and orders made for service and joint conference of experts.
- Legal Topics
- ['expert Evidence' 'single Expert Regime' 'admissibility of Expert Reports']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Equity Proceedings / Procedural Ruling on Leave to Adduce Further Expert Evidence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether communication between a party and the single expert compromises impartiality and independence' 'Whether defendants should be granted leave to adduce further expert evidence' 'Admissibility of expert reports prepared for other purposes']
Ratio Decidendi
Leave should be given to the defendants, plaintiffs, and cross-defendant to adduce further expert evidence where there are significant differences in valuation opinions and communication between a party and the single expert may affect perception of impartiality, so as to maintain open justice and avoid legitimate grievances.
Court Disposition
Leave granted to adduce further expert evidence and orders made for service and joint conference of experts.
Orders
- ['Defendants given leave to adduce evidence from Mr Jason David Field (affidavit of 10 December 2008 and valuation report exhibit JDF-1).' 'Plaintiffs and cross-defendant given leave to adduce evidence from one valuer each for relevant dates: 6 May 2008, 15 September 2008, 2 October 2008, and date of expert report.'...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment