Liddle, Theresa v Colonial Mutual Life Assurance Society Limited and Ors [1994] FCA 1058
Nothing was put before the court to indicate that the ordinary rule as to costs should not apply; thus, the first respondents are entitled to their costs of the proceedings, including reserved costs, to be taxed if not agreed.
- Parties
- Applicant: Teresa Liddle; First Respondent: Colonial Mutual Life Assurance Society Limited; First Respondent: Peter Morley; Second Respondent: Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 December 1994
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Costs / Post Dismissal of Proceedings
- Outcome
- Costs awarded to first respondents against applicant.
- Legal Topics
- Costs Orders, Dismissal of Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Teresa Liddle
Applicant
Colonial Mutual Life Assurance Society Limited
First Respondent
Peter Morley
First Respondent
Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Costs / Post Dismissal of Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the first respondents are entitled to costs of the proceedings after dismissal
- 2 Whether the ordinary rule as to costs should apply
Ratio Decidendi
Nothing was put before the court to indicate that the ordinary rule as to costs should not apply; thus, the first respondents are entitled to their costs of the proceedings, including reserved costs, to be taxed if not agreed.
Court Disposition
Costs awarded to first respondents against applicant.
Orders
- The costs of the first respondents be paid by the applicant, together with all reserved costs and including any costs reserved in respect of any notice of motion, those costs to be taxed if not agreed.
- No application for costs by the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment