Bates v Wells [1999] NSWSC 778

Bates v Wells [1999] NSWSC 778

The plaintiff was an eligible person as a child of the deceased and, having regard to her present financial and material circumstances, the size of the estate, the nature of her needs, and the fact that the competing claims of the widow and son did not reduce or extinguish her entitlement, appropriate provision was a legacy of $100,000 rather than the full amount of claimed residential improvements.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
29 July 1999
Procedural Posture
Proceedings Under the Family Provision Act 1982 for Provision Out of the Estate of David John Wells / Judgment on Summons Filed 13 July 1998
Outcome
The plaintiff was awarded provision out of the deceased's estate.
Legal Topics
['family Provision' 'provision Out of Deceased Estate' 'eligible Person' 'estrangement' 'competing Claims on Estate']
['succession Law' 'equity'] ['family Provision' 'provision Out of Deceased Estate' 'eligible Person' 'estrangement' 'competing Claims on Estate']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Proceedings Under the Family Provision Act 1982 for Provision Out of the Estate of David John Wells / Judgment on Summons Filed 13 July 1998

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the plaintiff, as a child of the deceased, was an eligible person under the Family Provision Act 1982.' "Whether provision should be made for the plaintiff's maintenance, education and advancement in life out of the deceased's estate." "Whether the plaintiff's claimed needs and financial circumstances justified provision in the amount sought or some lesser amount." "Whether competing claims of the deceased's widow and son should reduce or extinguish any provision for the plaintiff."]

Ratio Decidendi

The plaintiff was an eligible person as a child of the deceased and, having regard to her present financial and material circumstances, the size of the estate, the nature of her needs, and the fact that the competing claims of the widow and son did not reduce or extinguish her entitlement, appropriate provision was a legacy of $100,000 rather than the full amount of claimed residential improvements.

Court Disposition

The plaintiff was awarded provision out of the deceased's estate.

Orders

  • ['The plaintiff receive out of the estate of the late David John Wells a legacy in the sum of $100,000, such legacy not to bear interest if paid on or before 26 August 1999, and if not so paid to bear interest at Supreme Court rates.' 'The costs of the plaintiff on the party and party basis and the costs of the...