Druett and Coles Myer and Others [2006] NSWIRComm 62

Druett and Coles Myer and Others [2006] NSWIRComm 62

Coles Myer Logistics Pty Ltd was not Mr Druett's employer; Mr Druett was employed by Forstaff Australia Pty Ltd as a casual employee and had not been dismissed. Accordingly, Coles Myer Logistics must be removed as a respondent and its application for costs is refused.

Parties
Applicant (respondent to Notice of Motion): Garry Keith Druett; Respondent (applicant to Notice of Motion): Coles Myer Logistics Pty Ltd
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
03 March 2006
Procedural Posture
Unfair Dismissal Application / Decision on Notice of Motion
Outcome
notice of motion granted; application for costs refused; matter listed for conciliation and directions
Legal Topics
Termination of Employment, Unfair Dismissal, Labour Hire Arrangements, Costs Application

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Garry Keith Druett

Applicant (respondent to Notice of Motion)

Coles Myer Logistics Pty Ltd

Respondent (applicant to Notice of Motion)

Procedural Posture

Unfair Dismissal Application / Decision on Notice of Motion

  1. 1 Whether Coles Myer Logistics Pty Ltd was the employer of Garry Keith Druett for the purposes of the unfair dismissal application
  2. 2 Whether costs should be awarded to Coles Myer Logistics Pty Ltd

Ratio Decidendi

Coles Myer Logistics Pty Ltd was not Mr Druett's employer; Mr Druett was employed by Forstaff Australia Pty Ltd as a casual employee and had not been dismissed. Accordingly, Coles Myer Logistics must be removed as a respondent and its application for costs is refused.

Court Disposition

notice of motion granted; application for costs refused; matter listed for conciliation and directions

Orders

  • The notice of motion filed by Coles Myer Logistics on 18 August 2005 is granted.
  • The Coles Myer Logistics application for costs is refused.