Terrain Solar Pty Ltd v Wagga Wagga City Council [2019] NSWLEC 1003
The parties' agreement was within the court's power to make and, as mandated by s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, the proceedings were disposed of in accordance with that agreement, and development consent was granted subject to agreed conditions.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 January 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Post Conciliation Conference, Judgment and Orders
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development application approved subject to conditions
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'conciliation Conference' 'court Approval of Agreement' 'environmental Planning Consent']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Post Conciliation Conference, Judgment and Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the court should grant development consent following agreement at conciliation conference' "Whether the court may dispose of proceedings in accordance with the parties' decision under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979"]
Ratio Decidendi
The parties' agreement was within the court's power to make and, as mandated by s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, the proceedings were disposed of in accordance with that agreement, and development consent was granted subject to agreed conditions.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development application approved subject to conditions
Orders
- ['Leave granted to Applicant to rely on amended plans as identified' 'The appeal is upheld' 'Development application No. 2017STH034 - Wagga - DA17/0679 for electricity generation works comprising a 30 MW solar farm and associated structures, works and infrastructure is approved in accordance with conditions in...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment