Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Golby, Terrence & Anor [1998] FCA 229
The clearance paragraph, read in the context of the letter of approval and the objective circumstances known to the Bank, imposed obligations on all parties and required the Bank not to grant partial discharges of its mortgage over Abington Park where that would permit Mr Barry to receive proceeds of initial lot sales otherwise than in reduction of the joint advance. The Bank's contrary construction was not supported by the peremptory language of the paragraph, and the obligation continued while any part of the advance remained unpaid despite the twelve month repayment provision.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 March 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Contract Appeal Concerning Banker and Customer Obligations Under a Letter of Approval for a Bills Discount Facility / On Appeal From a Judge of the Federal Court of Australia
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['construction of Contract' 'banker and Customer' 'bills Discount Facility' 'mortgage Security' 'application of Proceeds of Sale']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Contract Appeal Concerning Banker and Customer Obligations Under a Letter of Approval for a Bills Discount Facility / On Appeal From a Judge of the Federal Court of Australia
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the clearance paragraph in the Bank's letter of approval imposed an obligation on the Bank to ensure that funds received from initial sales of subdivided lots were applied to reduce the advance to the three borrowers." "Whether the Bank breached its contractual obligations by granting partial discharges and crediting the nett proceeds of sale of three lots to Mr Barry's personal account without the consent of the Golbys."]
Ratio Decidendi
The clearance paragraph, read in the context of the letter of approval and the objective circumstances known to the Bank, imposed obligations on all parties and required the Bank not to grant partial discharges of its mortgage over Abington Park where that would permit Mr Barry to receive proceeds of initial lot sales otherwise than in reduction of the joint advance. The Bank's contrary construction was not supported by the peremptory language of the paragraph, and the obligation continued while any part of the advance remained unpaid despite the twelve month repayment provision.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['The appeal be dismissed.' "The appellant pay the respondents' costs of the appeal."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment