Murphy & Anor -v - Waverley Council [2009] NSWLEC 1386
The amended stepped design for the privacy screen extension, including the reversed angling down of the louvers and reduction in height for some panels, sufficiently addresses concerns about amenity, compatibility, and privacy, such that there are no issues sufficient to warrant refusal of the application.
- Parties
- Applicant: Terrence Paul and Tracey Anne Murphy; Respondent: Waverley Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 November 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Development Application Appeal / Judgment After Hearing
- Outcome
- appeal upheld
- Legal Topics
- Development Approval, Privacy Screens, Residential Amenity, Building Controls
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Terrence Paul and Tracey Anne Murphy
Applicant
Waverley Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Development Application Appeal / Judgment After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposed extension to the privacy screen is compatible with surrounding development
- 2 Whether the extension maintains or enhances the amenity of the locality
- 3 Whether the impact on access to daylight and appearance is acceptable
Ratio Decidendi
The amended stepped design for the privacy screen extension, including the reversed angling down of the louvers and reduction in height for some panels, sufficiently addresses concerns about amenity, compatibility, and privacy, such that there are no issues sufficient to warrant refusal of the application.
Court Disposition
appeal upheld
Orders
- The appeal is upheld.
- Development consent is granted for the extension of the existing privacy screens adjacent to the rear terrace of the dwelling house at 63 Belgrave Street, Bronte, subject to agreed conditions in Annexure A.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment