PRITCHARD v TRIUS CONSTRUCTIONS PTY LIMITED & Ors [No 2] [2011] NSWSC 1114
The claim for contribution pursuant to s5(1)(c) Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1946 was found to be 'in respect of' personal injury damages and thus pre-judgment interest should be calculated in accordance with s18 of the Civil Liability Act 2002. The offer of compromise made on 10 May 2011, while including a provision for costs, was valid as an offer of compromise under Pt 20 r 20.26 UCPR and entitled Trius to indemnity costs from the date of the offer.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Terrence Stephen Pritchard; First Defendant: Trius Constructions Pty Limited; Second Defendant: Oceanic Coal Australia Pty Ltd; Cross Claimant: Oceanic Coal Australia Pty Ltd; Cross Defendant: Trius Constructions Pty Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 September 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Post Judgment Application for Interest and Costs
- Outcome
- Application granted in favour of Trius; interest to be calculated in accordance with s18 of the Civil Liability Act 2002; indemnity costs order made.
- Legal Topics
- Personal Injury Damages, Contribution Between Tortfeasors, Pre Judgment Interest, Offer of Compromise, Costs Assessment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Terrence Stephen Pritchard
Plaintiff
Trius Constructions Pty Limited
First Defendant
Oceanic Coal Australia Pty Ltd
Second Defendant
Oceanic Coal Australia Pty Ltd
Cross Claimant
Trius Constructions Pty Limited
Cross Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Post Judgment Application for Interest and Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether pre-judgment interest on contribution is to be calculated under s18 Civil Liability Act 2002 or s101 Civil Procedure Act 2005.
- 2 Whether the offer operated as an offer of compromise under Pt 20 r 20.26 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005.
- 3 Meaning of 'exclusive of costs' in Pt 20 r 20.26(2) UCPR.
Ratio Decidendi
The claim for contribution pursuant to s5(1)(c) Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1946 was found to be 'in respect of' personal injury damages and thus pre-judgment interest should be calculated in accordance with s18 of the Civil Liability Act 2002. The offer of compromise made on 10 May 2011, while including a provision for costs, was valid as an offer of compromise under Pt 20 r 20.26 UCPR and entitled Trius to indemnity costs from the date of the offer.
Court Disposition
Application granted in favour of Trius; interest to be calculated in accordance with s18 of the Civil Liability Act 2002; indemnity costs order made.
Orders
- Prejudgment interest payable by Trius to Oceanic to be calculated in accordance with s18 of the Civil Liability Act 2002.
- Oceanic to have costs of proceedings in relation to claim under s5(1)(c) as agreed or assessed to 10 May 2011.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment