R (Cth) v Alqudsi (No 8) [2023] NSWSC 355
Given the grave nature of the offence—directing activities of a terrorist organisation contemplating catastrophic attacks and the lack of genuine remorse or disavowal of extremism—a custodial sentence of 15 years with a non-parole period of 11 years and 3 months is appropriate, commencing 11 November 2019, satisfying the statutory requirements and sentencing principles relevant to terrorism offences.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 April 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentence
- Outcome
- conviction and custodial sentence imposed
- Legal Topics
- ['terrorism Offences' 'sentencing']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What is the appropriate sentence for intentionally directing activities of a terrorist organisation under s 102.2 Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth)?']
Ratio Decidendi
Given the grave nature of the offence—directing activities of a terrorist organisation contemplating catastrophic attacks and the lack of genuine remorse or disavowal of extremism—a custodial sentence of 15 years with a non-parole period of 11 years and 3 months is appropriate, commencing 11 November 2019, satisfying the statutory requirements and sentencing principles relevant to terrorism offences.
Court Disposition
conviction and custodial sentence imposed
Orders
- ['Offender convicted of directing activities of a terrorist organisation between about 30 August 2014 and 31 December 2014 at Sydney.' 'Offender sentenced to 15 years imprisonment commencing 11 November 2019, expiring 10 November 2034.' 'Non-parole period fixed at 11 years and 3 months, expiring 10 February 2031.'...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment