Cole v. Kealey [2001] NSWCA 336
The advance of $100,000 made on 27 September 1996 was more likely than not a personal loan from Kealey to Cole, based largely on accepted evidence of a conversation in which Cole requested the loan for himself and undertook to repay it personally. The trial judge's findings were not undermined by documentary evidence or alleged inconsistencies, and were sufficiently grounded in the accepted facts.
- Parties
- Appellant: Terry Cole; Respondent: John Kealey
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 September 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Loan, Company Vs Principal Liability, Appealable Error
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Terry Cole
Appellant
John Kealey
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the $100,000 loan was made to Terry Cole personally or to the company (CAV Australia Pty Ltd)
- 2 Whether the trial judge made an appealable error in determining the nature of the loan
Ratio Decidendi
The advance of $100,000 made on 27 September 1996 was more likely than not a personal loan from Kealey to Cole, based largely on accepted evidence of a conversation in which Cole requested the loan for himself and undertook to repay it personally. The trial judge's findings were not undermined by documentary evidence or alleged inconsistencies, and were sufficiently grounded in the accepted facts.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment