Picker v SAS Trustee Corporation [2009] NSWIRComm 53
The appellant did not have an accrued right to apply for superannuation allowance prior to the introduction of s 10(1BA) and s 10(1BA) does not irreconcilably conflict with s 16A; a late application can be considered if the respondent deems it desirable under s 16A.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 April 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application allowed so far as respondent must consider the late application under s 16A
- Legal Topics
- ['accrued Rights' 'late Application' 'statutory Conflict']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the appellant had an accrued right to apply for superannuation allowance under the Police Regulation (Superannuation) Act 1906' 'Whether there was a conflict between s 10(1BA) and s 16A of the Act' 'Whether a late application can be considered under s 16A']
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant did not have an accrued right to apply for superannuation allowance prior to the introduction of s 10(1BA) and s 10(1BA) does not irreconcilably conflict with s 16A; a late application can be considered if the respondent deems it desirable under s 16A.
Court Disposition
Application allowed so far as respondent must consider the late application under s 16A
Orders
- ['The SAS Trustee Corporation shall consider any application by Terry Picker for payment of a superannuation allowance in accordance with the provisions of s 16A of the Police Regulation (Superannuation) Act 1906.' "Respondent to bear appellant's costs, as agreed or assessed; liberty to apply within 28 days if not...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment