TFR Pty Ltd trading as Design Workshop Australia v Burwood Council [2019] NSWLEC 1447
The Court approved the parties’ agreement to grant conditional consent to the construction of a five-storey boarding house, upholding a written request to vary the height of buildings standard under clause 4.6 of the Burwood LEP, as the variation was justified on planning grounds and the development was otherwise compatible with the local character and consistent with planning objectives.
- Parties
- Applicant: TFR Pty Ltd trading as Design Workshop Australia; Respondent: Burwood Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 September 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Development Appeal (class 1) / Post Conciliation, Final Orders Made
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development consent granted subject to conditions and costs order made against the applicant.
- Legal Topics
- Development Application, Boarding Houses, Height of Buildings Variation, Affordable Rental Housing, Conciliation Conference, Consent Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
TFR Pty Ltd trading as Design Workshop Australia
Applicant
Burwood Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Development Appeal (class 1) / Post Conciliation, Final Orders Made
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether development application for a boarding house at 40-46 Stanley Street, Burwood should be approved
- 2 Whether the height of buildings development standard in clause 4.3 of the Burwood Local Environmental Plan 2012 should be varied under clause 4.6
- 3 Whether the amended plans meet requirements for consent under relevant planning instruments
Ratio Decidendi
The Court approved the parties’ agreement to grant conditional consent to the construction of a five-storey boarding house, upholding a written request to vary the height of buildings standard under clause 4.6 of the Burwood LEP, as the variation was justified on planning grounds and the development was otherwise compatible with the local character and consistent with planning objectives.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development consent granted subject to conditions and costs order made against the applicant.
Orders
- Leave is granted to the Applicant to rely upon the amended plans and documents listed in condition 1 of Annexure 'A'.
- The Applicant is to pay the Respondent's costs thrown away in accordance with section 8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 in the amount of $12,500.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment