The Bunker 2017 Pty Ltd v North Sydney Council [2019] NSWLEC 1365
The Court found that the works and use the subject of the development and Building Information Certificate applications were wholly within lots 148 and 167 and thus the owners corporation's consent was not required for the applications. Fixings and services reliance on common property did not, per authority, amount to works to common property requiring consent. The amenity, security, and waste management issues raised by the owners corporation were considered sufficiently mitigated by amended conditions and plan of management, and development consent was granted with limitations on hours and occupancy.
- Parties
- Applicant: The Bunker 2017 Pty Ltd; First Respondent: North Sydney Council; Second Respondent: The Owners – Strata Plan No 63731
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 August 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Principal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld in part; development application approved; Building Information Certificate issued; modification application refused
- Legal Topics
- Development Applications, Building Information Certificate, Owners Corporation Consent, Strata Management, Residential and Commercial Amenity, Waste Management
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Bunker 2017 Pty Ltd
Applicant
North Sydney Council
First Respondent
The Owners – Strata Plan No 63731
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Principal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether owners corporation's consent is required for a Building Information Certificate application in respect of works within a lot in a strata plan
- 2 Whether works that rely or encroach on common property require the consent of the owners corporation
- 3 Whether the proposal for use of a commercial lot as an office has an unacceptable impact on the amenity and security of the mixed-use building
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that the works and use the subject of the development and Building Information Certificate applications were wholly within lots 148 and 167 and thus the owners corporation's consent was not required for the applications. Fixings and services reliance on common property did not, per authority, amount to works to common property requiring consent. The amenity, security, and waste management issues raised by the owners corporation were considered sufficiently mitigated by amended conditions and plan of management, and development consent was granted with limitations on hours and occupancy.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld in part; development application approved; Building Information Certificate issued; modification application refused
Orders
- Appeal is upheld.
- Development Application No. 294/18 for use of lot 148 for office premises and lot 167 for car parking and bicycle storage is approved, subject to conditions of consent at Annexure A.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment