The Commissioner for Children and Young People v IK and Anor [2005] NSWSC 1136
The Tribunal did not err in law: it correctly placed the onus on the applicant, fully considered all evidence including both expert and lay testimony, did not deny natural justice by reference to DSM IV, nor reverse or misapply the onus of proof. There was no legal error warranting intervention and the appeal fails.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 November 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From the Administrative Decisions Tribunal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['prohibited Employment' 'child Related Employment' 'onus of Proof' 'natural Justice' 'expert Evidence' 'risk Assessment']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From the Administrative Decisions Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Tribunal erred in law in making an order that the Child Protection (Prohibited Employment) Act 1998 does not apply to the first defendant in respect of two prior offences' 'Whether the Tribunal erred by relying on or misapplying expert evidence' 'Whether there was a denial of natural justice' 'Whether the Tribunal reversed the onus of proof']
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal did not err in law: it correctly placed the onus on the applicant, fully considered all evidence including both expert and lay testimony, did not deny natural justice by reference to DSM IV, nor reverse or misapply the onus of proof. There was no legal error warranting intervention and the appeal fails.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['The appeal is dismissed' 'The orders of the Tribunal are confirmed' 'I invite submissions as to costs']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment