CPSU, Community & Public Sector Union & Ors v Commonwealth of Australia [1999] FCA 653
There is no serious issue to be tried on the facts presented; the Family Court’s restructuring and creation of new Deputy Registrar positions does not amount to a breach of statutory duty or contract, nor does it contravene provisions concerning prohibited reasons or duress in the Workplace Relations Act. The...
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 May 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Interlocutory Relief and Notice of Motion / Interlocutory Hearing; Orders and Reasons for Judgment
- Outcome
- Application for interlocutory relief dismissed; respondent's notice of motion adjourned.
- Legal Topics
- ['breach of Statutory Duty' 'breach of Contract' 'representative Proceedings' 'australian Workplace Agreement' 'workplace Restructure']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Interlocutory Relief and Notice of Motion / Interlocutory Hearing; Orders and Reasons for Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the respondent breached statutory duty under the Public Service Act 1922 (Cth) in its restructure of Deputy Registrar positions' 'Whether there was breach of contract in relation to Deputy Registrars’ employment' 'Whether the respondent’s conduct contravened ss 170WG(1) and 298K of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth)' 'Whether the proceeding could continue as a representative proceeding under s 33E of Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth)']
Ratio Decidendi
There is no serious issue to be tried on the facts presented; the Family Court’s restructuring and creation of new Deputy Registrar positions does not amount to a breach of statutory duty or contract, nor does it contravene provisions concerning prohibited reasons or duress in the Workplace Relations Act. The representative proceeding cannot continue for group members who are officers of the Commonwealth absent written consent as required under s 33E(2)(d) of the Federal Court of Australia Act.
Court Disposition
Application for interlocutory relief dismissed; respondent's notice of motion adjourned.
Orders
- ["The applicants' application for interlocutory relief be dismissed." "The respondent's notice of motion be adjourned to 10.15 am on 7 June 1999."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment