Wily, Hugh Jenner in his capacity as Official Liquidator of United Telecasters Sydney Limited (receivers and managers appointed) (in liq) & Anor v The Commonwealth of Australia Wiley, Hugh Jenner in his capacity as Official Liquidator of United Telecasters Sydney Limited (receivers and managers appointed) (in liq) & Anor v [1996] FCA 303
Section 468(1) of the Corporations Law applies only to dispositions of property of the company in which the company has a beneficial interest, in the sense of an interest available in the winding up. Since the funds paid by the receivers to the Commonwealth were subject to a fixed charge and the company had no...
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 May 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal and on Question for Separate Determination
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['receivership' 'liquidation' 'disposition of Company Property' 'fixed and Floating Charges' 'statutory Interpretation']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal and on Question for Separate Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether payments made by receivers and managers after commencement of winding up constitute dispositions of property of the company within s 468(1) of Corporations Law' "Whether 'property of the company' under s 468(1) is limited to property in which the company has a beneficial interest" 'Whether payments from accounts subject to a fixed charge are dispositions within the meaning of s 468(1)']
Ratio Decidendi
Section 468(1) of the Corporations Law applies only to dispositions of property of the company in which the company has a beneficial interest, in the sense of an interest available in the winding up. Since the funds paid by the receivers to the Commonwealth were subject to a fixed charge and the company had no beneficial interest in them at the relevant times, the payments did not constitute dispositions of property of the company within s 468(1) and were not void against the liquidator.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['That the appeal be dismissed.' "That the appellants pay the respondent's costs of the appeal."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment