R v Chehab [2013] NSWCCA 62

R v Chehab [2013] NSWCCA 62

The respondent's compliance with bail conditions, commitment to addressing behavioural issues, and willingness to seek employment did not constitute exceptional circumstances required under s 9D of the Bail Act 1978; therefore, bail was revoked.

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Applicant: The Crown; Respondent: Hussan Chehab
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
21 March 2013
Procedural Posture
Criminal Bail Review / Appellate Review of Bail Decision
Outcome
Bail revoked
Legal Topics
Bail Review, Exceptional Circumstances, Personal Violence Offences
Criminal Law Bail Review Exceptional Circumstances Personal Violence Offences

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Crown

Applicant

Hussan Chehab

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Bail Review / Appellate Review of Bail Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the respondent established exceptional circumstances justifying bail under s 9D of the Bail Act 1978

Ratio Decidendi

The respondent's compliance with bail conditions, commitment to addressing behavioural issues, and willingness to seek employment did not constitute exceptional circumstances required under s 9D of the Bail Act 1978; therefore, bail was revoked.

Court Disposition

Bail revoked

Orders

  • Bail is revoked.