R v Rigby [1956] HCA 38
The Supreme Court did not have jurisdiction to answer the questions on the purported case stated because the document did not comply with s.36 of The Land Acts—it failed to state the essential facts as found, and no clear question of law arose; accordingly, the Supreme Court's order must be discharged and the matter remitted for restatement of the case stated (if pursued), in proper form setting out ultimate facts and grounds of decision under the relevant sections.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / High Court Appeal From Supreme Court (qld) Decision on Stated Case
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- ['compensation for Resumption' 'procedure for Stated Cases' 'function and Jurisdiction of Land Appeal Courts' 'statutory Interpretation of the Land Acts']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / High Court Appeal From Supreme Court (qld) Decision on Stated Case
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Supreme Court was correct to determine the stated case from the Land Appeal Court' 'Whether the Land Appeal Court and Supreme Court erred in law in their approach to compensation and valuation under The Land Acts' 'Whether the stated case conformed to statutory requirements such as s.36 of The Land Acts']
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court did not have jurisdiction to answer the questions on the purported case stated because the document did not comply with s.36 of The Land Acts—it failed to state the essential facts as found, and no clear question of law arose; accordingly, the Supreme Court's order must be discharged and the matter remitted for restatement of the case stated (if pursued), in proper form setting out ultimate facts and grounds of decision under the relevant sections.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- ['Discharge the order of the Supreme Court.' 'Set aside the purported case stated of the Land Appeal Court transmitted to the Registrar of the Supreme Court.' 'Let the Land Appeal Court (unless within 21 days of this order the claimants, respondents in the High Court, notify the Registrar of the Land Appeal Court...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment