The Dubler Group Pty Limited v Ku-ring-gai Council [2005] NSWLEC 18
The proposed development fails to adequately address the principle of streetscape under cl 32(a)(i) of SEPP 53, does not constitute 'good design' under cl 3(1)(d) of SEPP 53, and is inconsistent with the general aims of the Ku-ring-gai Planning Scheme Ordinance. Consent must therefore be refused.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 January 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Development Appeal / Judgment After Hearing
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed; applications refused
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'dual Occupancy' 'land Subdivision' 'bushfire Risk' 'streetscape' 'amenity' 'planning Instruments']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Development Appeal / Judgment After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the proposed development contributes to an attractive residential environment' 'Whether the proposed development provides an unacceptable bushfire risk' 'Whether the proposed development adversely impacts the amenity of nearby properties']
Ratio Decidendi
The proposed development fails to adequately address the principle of streetscape under cl 32(a)(i) of SEPP 53, does not constitute 'good design' under cl 3(1)(d) of SEPP 53, and is inconsistent with the general aims of the Ku-ring-gai Planning Scheme Ordinance. Consent must therefore be refused.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed; applications refused
Orders
- ['The appeals are dismissed.' 'DA 677/03, DA 678/03, DA 679/03, DA 680/03, DA 681/03 and DA 682/03 for a staged dual occupancy development culminating in the erection of 8 dwellings and the Torrens Title and the Community Title subdivision of the property at 385 Bobbin Head Road, North Turramurra is refused.' 'The...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment