The Hao Dinh v Liverpool City Council [2018] NSWLEC 1015
The Court upheld the appeal and directed the respondent to issue a building certificate, as the agreement reached between the parties was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 January 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Orders Following Conciliation Conference
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'conciliation Conference' 'building Certificate']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Orders Following Conciliation Conference
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the respondent should issue a building certificate in respect of the detached secondary dwelling located at 27 Bundemar Street, Miller']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court upheld the appeal and directed the respondent to issue a building certificate, as the agreement reached between the parties was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld
Orders
- ['The appeal is upheld.' "The respondent is directed to issue a building certificate in respect of the detached secondary dwelling at 27 Bundemar Street, Miller, in accordance with the application made on 12 February 2015 and as indicated on the plan annexed and marked 'A' to this agreement, by 8 January 2018."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment