R v Ellis [1925] HCA 56
Sec. 407(2) of the Crimes Act 1900 (N.S.W.) prohibits any comment, even by a co-accused, on an accused person's failure to give evidence. However, a contravention does not automatically amount to a substantial miscarriage of justice under sec. 6 of the Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (N.S.W.); the appellate court must consider the impact in all the circumstances.
- Parties
- Appellant: The King; Respondent: Ellis
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 December 1925
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Special Leave to Appeal From Supreme Court of New South Wales (full Court), Order Rescinded by High Court of Australia
- Outcome
- Special leave to appeal rescinded
- Legal Topics
- Comment on Accused's Silence, Substantial Miscarriage of Justice, Joint Trials, Crimes Act 1900 (n.s.w.), Sec. 407, Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (n.s.w.), Sec. 6
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The King
Appellant
Ellis
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Special Leave to Appeal From Supreme Court of New South Wales (full Court), Order Rescinded by High Court of Australia
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether sec. 407(2) of the Crimes Act 1900 (N.S.W.) prohibits comment by a co-accused on an accused person's failure to give evidence at a joint trial
- 2 Whether such comment constitutes a substantial miscarriage of justice under sec. 6 of the Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (N.S.W.)
Ratio Decidendi
Sec. 407(2) of the Crimes Act 1900 (N.S.W.) prohibits any comment, even by a co-accused, on an accused person's failure to give evidence. However, a contravention does not automatically amount to a substantial miscarriage of justice under sec. 6 of the Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (N.S.W.); the appellate court must consider the impact in all the circumstances.
Court Disposition
Special leave to appeal rescinded
Orders
- Order granting special leave to appeal rescinded
- Order for new trial of respondent stands
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment