THE NOMINAL DEFENDANT v ARIDA [1989] NSWCA 247

THE NOMINAL DEFENDANT v ARIDA [1989] NSWCA 247

There was no error in the trial judge's assessment of credibility or findings of fact regarding negligence, nor was there inadequacy in the approach to damages; consequently, there was no justification for appellate intervention.

Parties
Appellant: The Nominal Defendant; Respondent: Arida
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
23 August 1989
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal Decision
Outcome
Appeal and cross-appeal dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
Negligence, Damages, Quantum of Damages
Tort Law Negligence Damages Quantum of Damages

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Nominal Defendant

Appellant

Arida

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Court of Appeal Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge erred in finding the Nominal Defendant liable in negligence
  2. 2 Whether the assessment of damages for past and future economic loss was inadequate

Ratio Decidendi

There was no error in the trial judge's assessment of credibility or findings of fact regarding negligence, nor was there inadequacy in the approach to damages; consequently, there was no justification for appellate intervention.

Court Disposition

Appeal and cross-appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed with costs.
  • Cross-appeal dismissed with costs.